header image

In Schudson’s, Discovering the News chapter 1, he goes into great depth about the penny press and how it transformed journalism from 1830 and on. He describes the 1830’s as a revolution in journalism; one that “led to a triumph of ‘news’ over the editorial and ‘facts’ over opinion.”

Before 1830, party press and commercial press dominated the newspaper business. These papers were expensive. They cost about six cents an issue, and generally were only sold as a subscription. Not surprisingly, circulation was low. At the time, most editors were subservient to their political masters, so editorials and content were often skewed to one side.

Schudson says that names of newspapers said a lot about who ran them. Before the 1830’s, papers had names with “advertiser”, “commercial” or “mercantile” in their titles. After the 1830’s, papers had names like “critic”, “herald” or “tribune”, which expressed a sort of agency. The words “star” and “sun” suggested objects that illuminate the world. Just by looking at the titles, one could infer that after the 1830’s, newspapers became expressive of their editor’s personality.

The change in press in the 1830’s has been called the “commercial revolution”. This refers to the advent of the penny paper. The first penny paper was the New York Sun, first published in 1833. Penny papers were sold my newsboys for a penny each day, so they became available to a large number of people. Naturally, their circulation soared and quickly surpassed many six-penny papers.

Ads in penny papers began to aim more at the mortal person than a businessman. Patent medicines and ‘want’ ads became regular staples. The penny press was not fussy about who advertised either. Older newspapers wouldn’t print ads for “objectionable” content like theaters or lotteries.

Most penny papers claimed political independence as well. They were indifferent to political events. Penny papers also printed content aimed at and about the activities of a varied, urban, and middle-class society; not to a small, elite trading society. They published stories on local news using hired reporters.

The six-penny papers began to criticize the penny press for its advertising policies, especially those for patent medicines. They also claimed that the penny papers were sensational, mostly because they printed verbatim transcripts from court hearings or presidential addresses.

Schudson goes on to claim that the changes in journalism at this time were closely tied to the rise of a “democratic market society”. Basically, the democratization of business and politics. He says that technology and literacy also helped usher in this change. The steam press was invented in the 1820’s. It sped up the process of printing. Paper also changed. The Fourdrinier process, which processed rags into raw material, became widely used in America after 1827. The development of railroads and canals also helped newspaper circulation. The telegraph came into use in the 1840’s. Newspapers encouraged it’s development.

Schudson also says that widespread literacy stimulated the demand for newspapers. He questions whether the demand for newspapers brought more literacy or was it a result of inducements to a reading public.

Schudson goes on to talk about the Jacksonian era of democracy. President Jackson’s policies ushered in a democratic wave across the country in the form of manhood suffrage, informal manners, a cheap press and public schooling. This time transformed the country into a market democracy, one where the individual had new standing and a pursuit of self-interest was good. The established mercantile and financial leaders were upset by a newer group of enterprising capitalists. The founding of the penny press is an example of the new kind of entrepreneur.

To conclude the chapter, Schudson talks in depth about James Gordon Bennett, the founder of the New York Herald. This paper was very successful. It was aimed at a middle-class readership. Wall Street attacked Bennett for his money articles. He analyzed financial reports so that his readers could understand. Wall Street papers began a Moral War against Bennett in 1840, trying to get him our of business. They charged him with blasphemy, indecency, lying and blackmail. In the end, Bennett’s circulation was down only a few thousand.

Overall, the chapter discusses how important the penny papers were for developing modern journalism and making news available to the masses. There were a variety of reasons that penny papers succeeded, including technological advances, increased literacy and human interest stories.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

“The ideal of objectivity”

Posted by: | December 2, 2009 | No Comment |

Objectivity, a mainstay to modern journalism, was not always present in early American newspapers — nor was it expected. “Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers” considers objectivity’s role in American newspapers from the early days of the Penny Press to the 1970’s.

Discovering the News - Michael Schudson Author Michael Schudson‘s introduction lays the groundwork for what will become the emergence and expectation of objectivity in American newspapers.  Schudson focuses the development of objectivity around one of journalism’s greatest newsworthy subjects — war.

Pre-World War I (Definition of objectivity: “Facts are not human statements about the world, but aspects of the world itself.”)

Partisanship was standard fare in early American papers.  News centered on political speeches and later focused on sensationalism.  Schudson address the idea that the Associated Press might be credited with the rise of objectivity in journalism.  However, he refutes this idea stating, “into the first decades of the twentieth century…it was uncommon for journalists to see a sharp divide between facts and values.”

Post-World War I (Definition of objectivity: “Allegiance to rules and procedures created for a world in which even facts were in question.”)

Schudson attributes the rise of objectivity to propaganda and public relations during WWI.  Reporters began questioning the facts.  They began to think the facts they reported were constructed for them by the government and public relations companies.  Schudson states, “one response to this discomfiting view was the institutionalization in the daily paper of new genres of subjective reporting, like the political column.”

Post-World War II (Definition of objectivity: “A faith in ‘facts,’ a distrust of ‘values,’ and a commitment to their segregation.”)

Government interference, or as Schudson phrases it “government management,” began during World War I and played an ever increasing role after World War II.  Journalists also grew suspect of an “imperial presidency after World War II.”  During the Vietnam War, there was the growth of what Schudson refers to as the “adversary culture,” which affected not only reporters, but also the government and the nation as a whole.

Schudson’s Advice Concerning Objectivity

“Journalists, like other seekers, must learn to trust themselves and their fellows and the world enough to take everything in, while distrusting themselves and others and the appearances of the world enough not to be taken in by everything.”

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

Not until the 1890s were reporters truly regarded as necessities to the newspaper world.  Regardless of popular belief it was not the Civil War that set this new practice into motion.  Journalism was already heading in a new direction, and it was the papers of New York that would ultimately take it there.

The drama between William Randolph Hearst and Richard Harding Davis over a story run about the Spanish-American War in the New York Journal brought reporters to the forefront of newspaper drama.  Penny papers again set the tone by being the first to employ reporters for local news.

Wanting to stay ahead of the game, New York papers spent anywhere between $60, 000 and $100,000 reporting the Civil War whereas other cities including Boston and Philadelphia spent between $10,000 and $30,000. Just before the War, the New York Tribune became the first paper to use stereotyping as a way to make newspapers.

Education also became an important factor, improving the level of writing that was seen in newspapers.  Both the New York Sun and Commercial Advertiser preferred hiring college graduates, and this soon became the trend.

Another trend that was emerging was the desire of readers to be given the facts. Yet along with this, there was a desire to still enjoy the articles. Being colorful as well as factual became the way to write.  Edwin L. Shuman wrote in his book “Steps into Journalism” that the recipe for success for a reporter is “reliability and sparkle.”

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

When people think of the term, “muckraker,” what comes to mind are some of the people that changed the history of the world forever.  Some of those people include Nellie Bly, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, Upton Sinclair, and plenty of others.  According to the dictionary, a muckraker is someone who seeks to expose corruption of businesses or government to the public. However, there was one man who truly coined the term of “muckraker,” and he spoke softly, and carried a big stick.  That man was Teddy Roosevelt.

TR campaigning and doing his thing in 1900

TR campaigning and doing his thing in 1900

From the 1700s-1800s there would be a huge increase in what would be known as, “muckraking.”  There was a lot of reporting during this century that had to do with the corruption of businesses and government. By the 1900s, magazines such as CosmopolitanThe Independent, and McClure’s were already in wide circulation and read frequently by the growing middle class.

The term “muckraker” was first used by Teddy Roosevelt in a speech in 1906 when he was President of the United States.  His quote was both memorable and was about William Randolph Hearst and yellow journalism.

“In Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress you may recall the description of the Man with the Muck-rake, the man who could look no way but downward with the muck-rake in his hands; Who was offered a celestial crown for his muck-rake, but who would neither look up nor regard the crown he was offered, but continued to rake to himself the filth of the floor.”

Roosevelt had his agreements and disagreements in muckraking.  First off, he was happy with these reporters “scraping the muck” of America and really showing what goes on behind the scenes of corporate America.  However, he also thought “the man who did nothing else was certain to become a force of evil.”

While Roosevelt was president, he had his restrictions on those attempting to “muckrake.” For instance, in Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, Sinclair wrote about the dangers of the meat-packing industry, poverty, absence of social programs, unpleasant living and working conditions, and unhappiness among the working class. Roosevelt began to get the wrong idea about Sinclair.

Political cartoon showing TR and his opinion of the meat-packing industry

Political cartoon showing TR and his opinion of the meat-packing industry

TR was suspicious of Sinclair being a socialist after reading the conclusion to The Jungle. After this, he sent labor commissioner Charles P. Neill and social worker James Bronson Reynolds to Chicago to make surprise visits to meat packing facilities and see what goes on in these factories.  These two men were highly trusted among Roosevelt, who did not trust too many people.  After seeing the factories, Neill and Reynolds still found the conditions at the factories less than appealing and and saw there was lack of concern among the managers who worked there.

Theodore Roosevelt did it all when he was President, as the whole “muckraking” movement would not be possible without him.  TR was very smart about how he went about the whole movement. He liked what was going on, but really carefully monitored what went on.  He believed in getting all of the right answers and did not want the American public to get lied to, as was going on. Roosevelt did things his way, which turned out to be quite successful and went a long way.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

During a recent class discussion,  I addressed a classroom full of peers concerning an important element of Mitchell Stephens book “A History of News.” The chapter revolved around the intricate question of whether or not news becomes better with better technologies–and if not then what exactly are we losing. Essentially, Stephens argues that from the mid twentieth century on, news continues to grow less and less valuable, as new technologies outpace the capacity by which news can be dispersed.  Stephens says as the velocity and volume of news has increased, then we as a society transform from true news-seekers to a news-waiters.

By examining sensationalism in this perspective and also with an eye cast towards the future, it is possible to better understand the news and why it flows the way it does.

A great example of a sensational story that many of my fellow classmates have cited over the course of the semester has been the impact of O.J. Simpson’s murder trial–as cited here, here, and here. Another good example of sensationalism in the modern era could be cited as the Bill Clinton sex scandal in 1998. Harken back to the 1996 Olympics, what happened there? If the word bomb came to your mind before the story of a certain red-haired gymnast,well there is a reason for that. Murder, sex, violence, all these stories share a common element: sensationalism.

As technology has progressed, we have instinctively become bored with news once it stops becoming breaking news. Therefore we always search for the next best thing to focus on. On July 23, Kerri Strug’s awe-inspiring vault for the ages was done-in four days later when a bomb exploded in Centennial Olympic Park. We had already been pounded hour after hour with interviews and analysis and inspiring montages of what had transpired on July 23, that by the time July 27th hit, America was ready for the next juicy story.

This is a great example of how technology helps to bring about sensationalism; or more accurately, how “better” technology brings about poorer journalistic quality. If a TV station has the resources and technology to report on stories that are poorly put together but bring about ratings, they will do so. This continues to this day, and as Stephens says in his book, technology may be great for journalism,  but at what cost? Well, that cost is, according to Stephens, our communities, our local news, and above all, quality of reporting.

In the past week, America has become concerned with this story and these people. The past few months we have been obsessed with things like  Swine Flu and Balloon Boy. And in the past year we have become neurotic over things like this. All the while we are at war, facing a huge economic crisis, are in environmental despair, suffer from ridiculous unemployment, but the only news we talk about is the kind that Stephens warns us about. Now this may not apply to all, but with the theme of looking forward in journalism as our guidance in this course, I implore you to ask yourself one question: when you wake up in the morning what is the first news-piece you search out? Even more concerning, do you search out the news still?

The point I am trying to make here is that technology, experience, and good training can all lead to good reporting. But when not used in conjunction with one another we are left with sub-standard news, and as a result the news we do get is often times delivered like this…

 

Okay, I just had to use this piece because it is so classic. But it also illustrates a great point. This fictional story was made 30+ years ago, but do you notice much of a difference in the manner that talking head acts compared to the talking heads of today? Because of 24-hour cable networks, we have talking heads that are loud, attention-grabbing, and sensational all the way to the barn. Sure we have access to news and opinions at our fingertips, but as Stephens asks: at what cost?

 

THAT’S the news today? Shame, shame.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

Travel reporting became popular in the early 20th century. It branched off into different subgenres including guidebooks and travel literature, which is travel writing of literary value. Travel literature involves a person traveling for pleasure and writing down their experience in a travelogue. Travelogues usually show a narrative beyond just jotting down dates and events.

Travel literature often uses essay writing about a country or nation. It often includes extended observations about a culture. Sometimes nature intersects with travel writing. Naturalists write about their scientific studies and observations of wherever they are traveling to.

One of the most famous naturalists and travel writers is Charles Darwin. Darwin was an Englishman who wrote his famous and controversial On the Origin of Species in 1859.

In 1831, Darwin traveled on the HMS Beagle for almost five years. The expedition was intended to chart the coastline of South America. Darwin spent most of his time on land surveying the geology and natural history of South America, while the Beagle charted the coastline. He kept careful notes and theoretical speculations. He sent letters back to his family describing his journey.

In 1839, Darwin published Journal and Remarks, commonly known as The Voyage of the Beagle. The book is a vivid and exciting travel memoir which includes his changing view on some scientific theories. It includes some of his theories about natural selection and evolution as they were being formed.

“Considering the small size of these islands, we feel the more astonished at the number of their aboriginal beings, and at their confined range… within a period geologically recent the unbroken ocean was here spread out. Hence, both in space and time, we seem to be brought somewhat near to that great fact – that mystery of mysteries – the first appearance of new beings on this earth.”

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

During a time when women were scorned in the workforce and expected to stay at home, one woman, Nellie Bly, was paving her way into becoming one of the greatest reporters of all time.

Nellie Bly, or birth name Elizabeth Cochran, started her career as a writer for the Pittsburgh Dispatch in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her pen name “Nellie Bly,” was established here.

For the Pittsburgh Dispatch, Bly wrote a lot about women’s rights and she also did a lot of small under-cover work, or investigative reporting. In fact, this is where Bly was believed to have pioneered investigative reporting.

After a series of under-cover reporting for the Pittsburgh Dispatch, Bly was determined to move on to bigger and greater things. She eventually moved to New York City and started writing for Joseph Pulitzers, The World.

One of Bly’s bigger investigative reporting tasks at The World was to check herself into the Blackwell’s Island insane asylum in 1887, in hopes of exposing any wrongdoings at this establishment. After spending a lot of time at the asylum, Bly had fully succeeded in uncovering many shocking wrongdoings to the asylum’s patients.

Towards the end of her career, Nellie Bly took on another big project for The World. In order to prove she had equal capabilities as men, Bly convinced The World editors to allow her the task of beating the record of going around the world in 80 days. Bly conquered her goal, and went around the world in only 72 days. Her travel experiences were published daily in The World, and were very popular. Bly’s name had truly become well known in society.

Nellie Bly’s role in investigative reporting brought journalism to new heights. After her death in 1922, The World published a statement saying that Nellie Bly was “THE BEST REPORTER IN THE WORLD.” And as we see today, her legacy still remains.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

London cafe society, circa 1954 (Getty Images)

London cafe society, circa 1954 (Getty Images)

Once they plotted revolutions,

now they’re typing blogs.

Today’s cafe society is a weak decaf.

By MICHAEL IDOV

The coffeehouse may just be mankind’s greatest invention. It certainly is the most collective one: In the classic, which is to say Viennese, form, the coffeehouse is perhaps the finest collaboration between Europe, Asia and Africa. It is almost as if every great civilization in the world had taken a brief time-out from trying to kill one another to brainstorm what a perfect public space should look like. The result was equal parts Athenian agora, Saharan oasis and Continental court, with pastries. Modernity in its bloody splendor has tumbled out of the coffeehouse: In January of 1913 alone, as Frederic Morton describes in his Vienna history “Thunder at Twilight,” Lenin, Trotsky, Hitler, Freud and Josip Broz Tito were using the same cups at Vienna’s Café Central. (Stalin was in town, too, but he was too much of a country bumpkin for espresso.)

under: Uncategorized

under: Uncategorized

Court rules against webcasting

Posted by: | November 20, 2009 | No Comment |

In April 2009, the 1st U.S. Court of Appeals, based in Boston, reversed a U.S. District Court‘s decision to allow webcasting coverage of court proceedings.

The case involved a lawsuit by Sony BMG Music brought against a Boston University student for downloading music.

The appeals judges noted the district judge overstepped her authority by initially allowing the webcast.  The appeals judges cited local civil rule 83.3 when issuing their opinion.

Most state courts allow cameras in the courtroom, but each federal court determines if, and when, cameras are permitted in federal court.

The ruling comes as no surprise, because the U.S. has a long history of wavering over reporter’s rights to cover trials.

According to Mitchell Stephens‘ book, “A History of News,” one judge tried to prohibit reporters from covering a trial by preventing them from taking notes during a murder trial in 1830.

By 1839, however, the federal judge in the famous Amistad case allowed reporters to cover the proceedings.

(stufffromthelab.wordpress.com)

(stufffromthelab.wordpress.com)

Nearly 100 years later, Bruno Hauptmann faced trial for the kidnap and murder of the Lindbergh baby.  Billed as the crime of the century, the world waited for the television coverage to begin.

After Hauptmann’s trial, the courts reverted to their exclusionary ways.  Courts issued rules prohibiting flash photography and loud, bulky television cameras in the courtroom.  That is, until O.J. Simpson rode into the spotlight with his trial of the century.

(pocoperdiem.wordpress.com)

(pocoperdiem.wordpress.com)

By then, technological breakthroughs made photography and videography more courtroom friendly.

In 1995, O.J. Simpson’s trial for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman brought court coverage back into prime time.  CourtTV, which is now TruTV, covered the trial from start to finish.  The trial garnered headlines for more than eight months.  Court TV saw its ratings skyrocket during the Simpson trial and immediately expanded its coverage of court cases.

Unfortunately, today’s courts are behind the times.  The laws and rules that cover access to court proceedings were written before the Internet.  Fortunately, some lawmakers are attempting to bring the laws and rules into the 21st century.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

The best at CBS

Posted by: | November 19, 2009 | No Comment |

Some knew him as king of the anchormen, others as the most trusted man in America, old ironpants, Uncle Walter, and to some he was the  first television anchorman.

 His name, Walter Leland Cronkite Jr., his image, news reporting at its best.

 

Walter Cronkite. mediabistro.com

Walter Cronkite. mediabistro.com

The career of Walter Cronkite in news began in 1935 in the newspaper industry but would switch to broadcasting the next year.  15 years later he would be working for CBS, a growing broadcast company.
Walter Cronkite would be recruited to CBS by Edward R. Murrow, the radio reporter who became famous for his “vivid radio reports from London for CBS, during the Battle of Britain.” 
 
Walter Cronkite became the face of the Evening News on CBS in 1962.  During the 19 years at the helm of the CBS Evening News, Walter Cronkite would cover the Vietnam War on location, Apollo 11 and 13, the Iran Hostage Crisis, and the Watergate Scandal.  His most notable report, arguably, would be of the John F. Kennedy Assassination in 1963
  

His first words to America were, “Here is a bulletin from CBS News. In Dallas, Texas, three shots were fired at President Kennedy’s motorcade in downtown Dallas. The first reports say that President Kennedy has been seriously wounded by this shooting.”  He would continue to keep America on the edge of their seats as they waited to find out exactly what happened and the condition of their president.

Walter Cronkite retired from his seat at The Evening News in 1981.  He would regret his decision would be a regretted one and he is quoted as saying, I want to say that probably 24 hours after I told CBS that I was stepping down at my 65th birthday, I was already regretting it. And I regretted it every day since.”

He would continue to do appear on television as a special correspondent for CBS and other news channels, and remained a public figure until his death in 2009 at the age of 92. 

 
 

“In seeking truth you have to get both sides of a story.” ~ Walter Leland Cronkite Jr.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

In our previous three blog entries, we discussed how technological advancements like the printing presssteam engine, telegraph, radio, and television (see beow) have helped spread information and the news to the public-at-large.   In our final entry, we will continue the discussion on how technology has helped shape the spread of information and the news.

1947-Farnsworth-GV260-10in

Source: http://www.wired.com

Like the television set, the Internet (see picture below) was another revolutionary advancement in technology, in terms of, spreading information and news because the Internet is able to connect people from different countries with each other.  For instance, I can talk to my cousin Vivian in Taiwan by e-mail or through the social networking site MySpace by using the Internet.   

 how-to-use-the-internet

Source: http://www.google.com   

Another, aspect of the Internet that helps spread information and news is the fact that many newspapers like the “New York Times” and the “Washington Post” have websites that carry their news stories online and often send breaking news alerts to people who subscribe to their e-mail alerts.  Smaller papers like the “Army Flier” in Enterprise, Alabama, which serves the Fort Rucker community also uses the Internet to spread news and information to the soldiers who live on the base.  My father, Robert Morse, interestingly enough, got his picture (see below) in this newspaper and its Facebook page when he attended Warrant Officer training in September.      

WOC Robert Morse assists World War II veteran Roger Spooner as he disembarks from a jumbo jet Saturday. Spooner visited with Morse and WOC James Lane after traveling with about 90 veterans to see the World War II Memorial in Washington. Photo by Marti Gatlin

Source: http://www.facebook.com/notes/army-flier/honoring-the-greatest-generation/141868040501

Overall, as one can see, technological advancements like the printing press, steam enginetelegraphradio, television, and the Internet has helped spread news and information more easily and effectively to the masses.

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories