header image

Winter haters

Posted by: | October 27, 2014 | No Comment |

Every time the weather gets the slightest bit chilly in the fall, people freak out about the weather being cold. Personally, I love cold weather and I cannot wait for the snow. I just don’t get why people are such winter haters. If you hate winter weather, don’t live where it is cold.

10407851_10205201813143874_8921704121923784737_n

My photo – this week Tuesday 10/28/14 will be a toasty 79 degrees while Saturday will be a frosty 46 degrees. That’s Fairfax, VA for you.

Of course, Northern Virginia is one of those places where the seasons seem to change day to day. It can go from being 70 degrees one day, to 50 degrees the next day, and then back up to 80-90 degrees a day later. I just don’t get our weather patterns. I understand why people complain that the weather makes it hard to dress (because it really does) but I just can’t understand cold complainers.

screen-shot-2014-01-06-at-4-23-15-pm

http://sassandbalderdash.com/2014/01/07/an-open-letter-to-people-who-hate-winter/

 

Who doesn’t like to wrap themselves in a nice, warm coat and pick up a Pumpkin Spice Latte at Starbucks? Those Ugg boats and faux fur lined jackets are just screaming to escape your closet.

When I was applying to colleges, I was looking at schools in the New England area of the U.S. and I asked a college representative how much snow they get on average. They looked at me sideways and said a few feet…and avoided my eyes. I told them I love snow and was hoping to get a lot and then they said, oh yes well it snows quite a few feet at a time actually. They knew that potentially telling someone that they get a lot of snow means they might not want to apply! Certainly not me.

And the best part of being in school during the winter is the insane amount of snow days we seem to get. Of course, having make up days sucks – but I always remember to just enjoy the time I have off when I can spend it in front of a fire with a cup of cocoa. And maybe even a good book.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Halloween hoaxes

Posted by: | October 27, 2014 | No Comment |

As an investigative journalist, I thought for the week of Halloween I would investigate a very common Halloween hoax that comes up year after year. Is Halloween candy collected from trick-or-treating safe to eat?

According to the Halloween poisoning page on snopes.com , the rumors of poisoned candy being distributed to children on Halloween is false. The tale originates as far back as 1989. Parents checked the contents of their kid’s collected candy for open wrappers that might be poisoned candy or contain razor blades. Did it every contain such things? Snopes says no.

Stories of children bringing home marijuana disguised as Snickers bars occurred as recently as 2000. This event occurred in Hercules California. Turns out a mailman bought the bag of Snickers, thinking that it was truly a bag of candy when it really was not.

http://mentalfloss.com/article/12914/brief-history-sick-people-tampering-halloween-candy

http://mentalfloss.com/article/12914/brief-history-sick-people-tampering-halloween-candy

Another popular story of Halloween candy poisoning is the death of a young boy named Timothy O’Bryan, who died from eating a cyanide laced Pixie Stix. Timothy’s father, Ronald O’Bryan, killed his son to collect a life insurance policy. He was convicted of murdering his son. This event was a purposeful attempt to kill a child, not a random event that parents worried about.

Of course, when it all comes down to it, many parents simply look through their children’s bags of trick-or-treat candy to make sure there are not any suspicious pieces or ones with open wrappers. Personally, my mom always did this with me and enforced a rule that I could only eat three pieces of candy that night. Of course, the one year I stuck to that rule was when I had the flu.

Or maybe, parents just look through their kids’ candy to steal the best pieces. I leave you with this video as a thought:

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The internet. It’s influence is undeniable. People everywhere around the planet are logged in and almost unknowingly succumbing to the role it plays on their lives, certainly more so than any other social medium since the invention of the newspaper. Essentially, it has created kind of a revolution in society, allowing people from all over the globe to communicate and express the themselves in any way they please. It has also changed the way the world treats people, causes, and thought. The net has forever altered society and to this day still remains a major clout om the human condition.

However, in my opinion, the internet has had a particularly noteworthy impact on certain aspects of society more than others. The truth is that although the internet has had a humongous bang on all corners of modern civilization, the simple fact of the matter is some blows have been bigger than others. Hence, the purpose of this blog entry.

I will now go over the different (and in my opinion, the most important) aspects in which the internet has affected society. For clarity and brevity’s sake, I have narrowed down the assorted qualities that have been affected by the internet to a list of five: Freedom of speech, the balance of power, anonymity, working from home, pornography, and e commerce. Allow me to continue.

Freedom of Speech

can-stock-photo_csp3677568

The Internet allows anyone who may not have the courage, or in whose locale it may not be acceptable, to reach out to others with their beliefs and ideas. This means that people who have a certain view can promote it without being worried about others laughing or holding prejudice against them: the Net provides places where they can find other people who agree with them. The only adverse effect is that beliefs that are illegal or socially unacceptable such as child pornography, neo-Nazism, racism, etc, can be broadcast through the Net with little or no censorship.

The Balance of Power

Balance-of-Power-Infographic

Society has also changed on the Net in the balance of power. The power members of society: celebrities, professional criminals, fashion setters, etc (all these people have been given their power through their titles) become much less powerful than they are in real life. The social group of advanced computer users, geeks, nerds, dweebs, hackers (they have many names) have a much larger power on the Internet because of their knowledge of its mechanics, and not just a position they have been given.

Anonymity

anonymous

What is perhaps the most remarkable affect the internet has made is on the way in we communicate with others. For many, the Internet is a savior of face, for it hides the simple traits of age, looks and class. It can allow people to gain positions and gain friends that they would never otherwise have the chance to in real life. For example, the maker of the popular online fantasy game Parallel Universe is only 19 years of age, but he has managed to construct, on his own, a large online game with hundreds of users. He has managed to deal with servers, acquire banner ads, reply to hundreds of emails and fix bugs in his game all by himself. If he had gone to a software development company and was employed to work on a game; he would likely be shunted to a far less important job than core design and coding. This shows how the Internet can give someone a great deal of experience and social status (among players and coders who like his game).

On the BBC Television show Making a Genius a young boy was mentioned who acted like a boy of his age in conference and public, but when he communicated via email he came across intelligent and like an adult. Some adults were unimpressed by his intelligence and do not think it was actual intelligence because they had not spoken to him via email. This is another example of how the Internet can break the barriers of age and social class.

Working from Home

0625_workfromhome_630x420

The workplace is becoming increasingly stressful for many people, with longer hours, polluted air in big cities, and so on. The Internet offers an alternative. Some businesses are starting to allow their employees to work at home for two to four days a week, sending their work in via e-mail or a direct connection to their company’s Intranet. Working from home has many advantages:

You can take short breaks for snacks and relaxation
You don’t need to pay for childcare
You save money on fuel by avoiding driving to work every day
You can start when you like – early or late
However, this system only works for computer-oriented jobs and it can also result in people not doing the work at all and just staying at home and watching TV, and even increasing their stress by leaving work until the last minute.

Pornography

k13805625

Society is increasingly accepting of sexual material, and the Internet has increased that: it is saturated by domain names with a sexual nature, owned by pornography web sites that charge a small entry fee. These sites allow people to view pornographic material anonymously, without being called a pervert, or being embarrassed by purchasing sex magazines. Whether this will enhance people’s sex lives and attitudes to sex, or make people only think about sex and result in more sex-related crime, is unknown at this stage.

E Commerce

From the number of television advertisements for internet shopping sites today, we all know that shopping is becoming a strong enterprise on the Internet. By selling items over the Internet, companies can save money on employing shop assistants, buying shops and land, administration costs and a many other things. The advantage for us – the shoppers – is that the shops then sell their goods at lower prices and are able to buy many more of the ’embarrassing’ items without being starred at in a busy shopping center.

However, because it is cheaper to run Internet sites, and less staff are needed, the workforce suffers. If a company went into complete Net integration, hundreds of jobs would be lost because a small team of people can run an Internet site. Another bad factor is that people will not leave their homes to go out shopping, so they will not socialize in or around shops, get needed exercise, or help their local economy. Many shopping sites are international so their profits may not be going into your country’s economy at all.

Conclusion:

Stated simply, what impact the internet has on us is up to us. It is here to stay, whether certain people like it or not. People cannot decline how big a part of our lives it is and how addicted to it we really are.  To summarize, all we need to do is to make sure we are controlling the internet, and that it is not controlling us.

Next     Home

under: Comm 455

Lowell Thomas, writer, traveler, broadcaster, was the first ever live television news broadcaster.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Lowell_Thomas_-_WJROneOfAKind.jpg/220px-Lowell_Thomas_-_WJROneOfAKind.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Lowell_Thomas_-_WJROneOfAKind.jpg/220px-Lowell_Thomas_-_WJROneOfAKind.jpg

 

His broadcast aired on NBC network in 1939.

It was a short stint that aired once a week and were summary type shows. The show did not last very long and there are numerous accounts to why. First, It was said that Lowell Thomas did not enjoy being in the studio all the time and loved the ability to travel. He had a strong belief that “People want to hear news, not see the people who are reading it.” Secondly, The U.S. entered World War II and thus innovation had halted and everything focused on supporting the war.

Lowell Thomas pioneered live television broadcasting

and later in 1941 Richard Hubbell was introduced into the scene as he broadcasted live television on the CBS network which began towards the end of World War II.

And finally later in 1948 when the coaxial cable was introduced is when television networks really started to make their push.

 

 

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , ,

Nellie Bly: The stunt-reporter

Posted by: | October 25, 2014 | No Comment |

Nellie Bly, pen name of Elizabeth Jane Cochrane, was an American journalist who launched a new kind of investigative journalism. She broke the record of Jules Verne’s fictional character Phileas Fogg from “Around the World in 80 Days” by famously globe-trotting, at 25 and unchaperoned, in 72 days. Bly also faked insanity for an undercover assignment to investigate reports of brutality and neglect at the Women’s Lunatic Asylum on Blackwell’s Island.

Nellie Bly

http://www.seattlepi.com/ae/article/New-Village-Theatre-musical-celebrates-the-1302257.php

Bly inspired many women over the years including Jean Marie Lutes, English professor at Villanova University in Pennsylvania and co-director of Villanova’s Gender and Women’s Studies program. Lutes took readers “around the world with Nellie Bly” by editing and annotating “Around the World in Seventy-Two Days and Other Writings.” The book spans her remarkable career, from 1885 to some of her last reports from the front lines in World War I and, finally, an advice columnist.” The book was released this year on the 150th anniversary of Bly’s birth.

“Inside the Madhouse,” her account of her 10 days posing as an inmate, “inspired a whole slew of imitators,” Lutes said. “Women were considered less brave, less smart. The ‘girl’ before the name was a diminutive,” she said, noting that there had been stunt reporting by male journalists. Bly “turned the tables and profited” from the designation.”

All in all, Lutes’ goal with the book was to bring awareness to many people today, especially women, of how brave Nellie Bly had been and how some of her opinions are still very significant in today’s world.

 

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , ,

“What’s great about this country is America started the tradition where the richest consumers buy essentially the same things as the poorest. You can be watching TV and see Coca-Cola, and you can know that the President drinks Coke, Liz Taylor drinks Coke, and just think, you can drink Coke, too. A Coke is a Coke and no amount of money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good.”
Andy Warhol

consumerism_flyer

Love it or not, hate it or not, support it or not, the inescapable truth is that we, as Americans, live in a consumer-based society. The theory here is that if our country consumes goods and services in large quantities, we will be better off economically, socially, and financially. In essence, our nation rides on the idea that it is good for people to spend a lot of money, and that this consumption – capitalists argue – is what gets our nation’s economic engine chugging along happily.

No matter what you think, we live to shop. Easy said as done.

BarbaraKruger-I-Shop-Therefore-I-Am-I-1987

So, several questions arise. What kind of leadership do we need to promote this ideal as effectively as possible, what policies do we need to implement in order to keep it moving, and what, if anything, should be done in this day and age to get our economy out of the dumps?

The answer is: we need to start spending again.

However, since the disastrous administration of former President George W. Bush, the public at large seems to be tired of republicans and everything they stand for. The simple fact of the matter is that more and more people in our country are turning to big government to solve our problems, and have been doing so since W’s run ended. Most appear to be fed up with the role of state – or the lack thereof – and want leaders like President Barack Obama to step in and magically fix the situation with his infinitely deep pockets and his abundance of blank checks. Obama has been riding on these tickets and sentiments like a surfer rides a wave for several years now, ever since he first took office, and it looks as though he shows no sign of stopping. In one speech he delivered, he even went as far to say that he wants to “make big government cool again.”

I just have to put this out there – when was big government ever cool?

Moving on, the unavoidable truth of the matter is that Obama’s big government initiatives might not be the answer we need in this day and age. It is easy to admit that at certain times – during a serious depression, during an international crisis, or during a weakening middle class, for example – big government serves a purpose and seems to do good for society. However, in a society where a recession is slowly recovering, the housing market is growing again, and the middle class is expanding, it is the opinion of this reporter that increasing the size and scope of the government may be a bad choice. And I’m being nice.

We may be in the midst of a total conundrum, but the solution itself seems quite apparent to me. We need a republican to take the presidential office to get our economy chugging again. Let me explain.

Republicans need to rebound after the catastrophe that was W and get back the support they had during the Reagan era. They need to earn back the public’s trust and remind people that they are the party of the people. Why is this important? Beucase republicans adhere to the philosophy that the smaller a government is, and the less impact it has on people’s lives, the better off we all are. Republicans believe that minimal government inference is the cutting stone of a flourishing society, and that when people are allowed to keep the money they make, they are more productive, happy, and cultured. Taxes and government spending seem to create a distrust of the state and make people feel as though they are not allowed to achieve the “good life,” make their mark on society, or chase the American Dream. In my opinion, the public has forgotten about this due to W. BUT, we can remind them once more that big government leaves a bad taste in their mouth.

The main reason I say a republican could change things for the better is that when taxes are hiked, people have less money in their pockets, and when people have less money in their pockets, they are inclined to spend less on consumer goods. And what happens when the people of a society based on consumerism suddenly stop consuming? The gears to the system come to a grinding halt. Shops go out of business. Jobs are cut. And in a society where businesses need to compete to create “the next big thing,” progress is hindered.

The reason I say we need a republican candidate in office is because republicans tend to oppose most taxes, especially unnecessary ones. In a consumer-based economy, this is a good thing, because it means that people are allowed to keep more of their own money. And, resultantly, when people have more of their own money, they tend to be more eager to spend it on goods and services – the backbone of capitalism. Think what you want, but when citizens of our nation buy things at the mall, it helps. In the U.S., spending money is a good thing. We should never be afraid to spend, because spending boosts the economy. However, if democrats keep digging in the pockets of Joe Blow consumer, he has less to spend on products that stimulate the market and make the financial world go round. We may be in a recession, but taxing the average consumer as a way of redistributing wealth weakens our society, especially if it makes it harder for him to put faith into the spending. I understand that a democrat (ahem, socialist) like Obama will employ taxes, take the money, and put it into programs to help the needy, but that approach ultimately undermines what our country stands for. A candidate like Romney would cut back taxes, stay out of the publics’ lives, and give the average consumer more confidence in buying things again. If this were to happen on a massive scale in our nation, our economy would rebound from its’ recession in a matter of months, merely due to the fact that we are putting our faith back in consumerism again.

 

workbuyconsumedie

Okay, to wrap up, I urge all of you to do the following: SPEND. BUY. PURCHASE. Even if it’s crap. Even if you’re not really sure you need it. Even if your wife might object. In a nation where the functionality of our economic system depends on what is mass consumed, we need it. And oh yea, and vote republican. Because you might have a little more dough in your pockets if you do.

 

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
https://flic.kr/p/oeh1ce

https://flic.kr/p/oeh1ce

Although the rise of print journalism helped to improve the accuracy of news being spread, it didn’t escape the influence of storytelling/word of mouth completely, especially about international affairs. Mitchell Stephens refers to this phenomenon in our text as “The Haze”, a factor that causes events out of the region’s range “to be seen in soft focus” (pg. 207).

The haze was particularly prominent when it came to more immediate news such as the death of an international leader or the end of a war or battle. News of these events would come back with travelers, their stories becoming the facts on which papers would base their coverage. The velocity of this information, although improved, would cause months to pass before the event was covered in the newspapers. Due to the speed and nature of how international information traveled, it was easy for it to transform and lead to false or misleading reports.

https://flic.kr/p/hN9rA3

https://flic.kr/p/hN9rA3

One of the most striking examples of the haze affecting the spread of international news to the United States is the fall of Napoleon. As the condition of Napoleon’s empire began to deteriorate, a similar effect occurred for the news received from the region. In the weeks and months following, false or exaggerated reports thickened the haze surrounding the situation. Conflicting reports continued, including that Napoleon had regained control of his empire rather than passing, and caused uncertainty around what had actually occurred. It wasn’t until much later that Americans were able to gain access to more accurate information about this situation.

The haze would continue to affect the spread of international news for some time during the early 19th century until new inventions such as the steam powered printing press and telegraph once again revolutionized and improved the velocity and accuracy of information.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Coffeehouses in London in the 18th century were the prominent form of spoken news. Each coffeehouse even had its own individual focus — from politics, to art, and even shipping news.

One particular shop, Lloyd’s, remains standing even today. Albeit with a very different purpose.

In the late 17th century, Lloyd’s attracted ship officers, traders, merchants, and bankers. The news in this shop circulated around what was happening in the shipping world.

http://www.rombouts.co.uk/blog/?p=658

http://www.rombouts.co.uk/blog/?p=658

Along with the daily reading of shipping news, people would also gather in Lloyd’s to do business and complete trade transactions.

Among the discussion in Lloyd’s over countless cups of coffee, came the realization that working together could help reduce risk of losing ships to the dangerous feat of sea-faring. Out of such discussions was born the first insurance agency offering marine insurance.

During the 18th century, several events including the American Revolution proved just how valuable insurance would be. Lloyd’s began to dominate the global shipping insurance market.

Additionally around this time, Llyod’s began publishing a weekly journal, “Lloyd’s List”, to keep readers informed about current shipping news. This journal still exists today reaching London and beyond!

In 1811, a network of insurance agents deemed “Lloyd’s Agency” was formed to connect the global market and make sure everything was running smoothly.

http://www.lloyds.com/lloyds/about-us/history/corporate-history/the-early-days

http://www.lloyds.com/lloyds/about-us/history/corporate-history/the-early-days

Lloyd’s remains standing today, in a much different-looking building than where the idea initially formed, as a prominent insurance market.

Of course, the world of insurance has changed immensely from this first agency. However, it is quite interesting to note that such an important aspect of today’s society was born out of a small coffee shop.

This goes to show just how influential spoken news truly is. Spoken news in this situation led to collaboration that allowed for the creation of a very beneficial system. While spoken news today is not nearly as prominent, the collaboration it encourages will always keep it around to at least some extent.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , ,

Sensationalism televised

Posted by: | October 21, 2014 | No Comment |

Sensationalism has manifested in multiple forms of journalism over time.  In the 1830s, there were the penny papers.  In the 1880s and 1890s, it shown through in the yellow journals.  In the 1920s, tabloids became dominant in sensationalist use.

Each of these forms of journalism utilized sensationalistic tactics to cater to and draw their audiences in.  Specifically, these forms of journalism utilized sensationalism because they were the most popular news source at the time and they wanted to stay that way.

This trend, of sensationalist use coinciding with the dominant news monger of the day, has translated more recently into television. 

'We interrupt this Special Bulletin to give you an even more special bulletin!'

Image from: http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/n/news_reporting.asp

This trend, while it took awhile to actually come about in television, is shown greatly in the way news stories are broadcast on television.  Flashy titles, special music that people have learned to connect with breaking news, titles such as “special news report,” and constant playback of a story provide the perfect ingredients for media hype, drawing in viewers.

Further, sensationalism shines on television in the form of tabloid talk shows, and reality television.

These genres of television rely on the sensationalism of their cast members and guests to maintain popularity.  Without sensationalist tactics, television, both in the form of news and entertainment, would not be nearly as popular as it is today.  It is thanks to the utilization of sensationalism that television had become and remained important and central to the gathering of news today.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , ,

There’s no noise in Illinois

Posted by: | October 21, 2014 | No Comment |
lake county

http://truenewsusa.blogspot.com/2013/05/lake-county-sheriff-chief-wayne-hunter.html

100 years ago, Lake County Independent was the local newspaper that predominantly covered news for Lake County, Illinois.

In the early 1900’s, these newspapers were much simpler than today’s.

Local news were really local.

So much so that the sample of newspapers were only a few pages long, and it seems to talk about people as if they should be known to the public.

Informing us of what may seem as trivial decisions at first glance, this newspaper contains the rich history of the United States. It shows us “modern-day folk” just what everyday life meant back then.

For example, on January 5th, 1900, Mr. and Mrs. F. A. Bock had a three-month-old who suffered, died, and was buried next to four other little girls. Not only does this text display the facts, but it also reflects the religious nature of that time stating, “it would seem she had budded on earth only to blossom in Heaven”.

This is something that might be scrutinized in today’s world. Although this country’s Constitution was built on religious (as well as moral) values, many today still take issue with it. Look at the “under God” or the “Christmas” versus “Holiday” tree controversy.

Additionally, local news today would probably not include whether or not “Miss Mary Norton is visiting her aunt at Batavia, Ill.” News today is about entertainment. After all, our book does say murder is the most reported crime since it is the most fascinating.

Besides, no ratings, no journalism.

But, do you think we could learn from the 1900’s simpler accounts of news?

under: Comm 455, Local news, newspapers
Tags: , , , ,

Friendly fires

Posted by: | October 20, 2014 | No Comment |

War reporting sets public opinion ablaze.

You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war.”— William Randolph Hearst

Photo Credit: www.ushistoryscene.com

And thus, war reporting was born.

The American public is bombarded with war reports. Some call for protests, others for support and all call for attention. The weapon of choice in this information war is photographs, or photojournalism to be more precise. Since pictures are worth a thousand words, they often resonate with readers more than cold, “black and white” facts on paper ever will.

But what happens when the pictures stop speaking and the public starts?

War. War happens. The current one is waged between those who support the right to know and those who feel that this right is wrong. How much do readers and consumers want to know? Are readers comfortable with being exposed to the horrors of war? Most importantly, are they really getting the full story?

War reporting often breeds propaganda, a seedy news parasite that (in turn) breeds mistrust. When Hearst made this statement, he did so in good faith; America was on the brink of starting a war with Spain. Hearst knew that all he needed to sway public opinion on said war was a few pictures and sub-par supportive text. His exaggeration and knack for propaganda was a leading cause of US entry into the Spanish-American war.

This press privilege speaks volumes about the power of the printed word  and the predicament of those who seek information; they never really know if they receive the right kind.

Maybe once the camera stops rolling, the truth will start rolling. And then, maybe then…the full stories will be told.

 

under: Comm 455
Tags: ,

What’s in your wallet…

Posted by: | October 20, 2014 | No Comment |

A morning glory, hold up, armed robbery and a passing of the note are all common ways that criminals rob people. Moreover it was the “traditional way” that criminals robbed people. That is until technology exploded and transactions as we know it of purchasing in brick-and-mortar are gearing more towards online shopping and even online banking.

Which brings us to our modern day crime… Cyber Crime

A recent study that came out has proved with statistical analysis that the new form of robbery is through the internet. “Cyber crooks leave traditional bank robbers in the dust.

According to the study cyber criminals have stollen more than $25 million in the 3rd quarter of 2009 alone. Whereas traditional stick-up artists hauled in slightly more than $9.4 million.

And costs of cyber crime for corporations have doubled in only 4 years. Beginning at $6 million and skyrocketing to $13 million.

The toughest pill to swallow about all this is that cyber criminals treat what they do as a business and a job. They work together to create strategic strategies and tools in order to coordinate attacks. 

It is very difficult to prevent cyber crooks from infiltrating what we do. On an everyday basis we are constantly laying out all our information on the web for our personal pleasures not knowing who is waiting and watching.

My advice…. ALWAYS know what’s in your wallet.

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xmSYuDpDbFE/UPzvs6q9g0I/AAAAAAAAABw/ec9wsCY_T2E/s1600/cyber-crime6.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xmSYuDpDbFE/UPzvs6q9g0I/AAAAAAAAABw/ec9wsCY_T2E/s1600/cyber-crime6.jpg

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories