header image

The future of e-books

Posted by: | December 1, 2011 | No Comment |

As with most new technology, there are those who love e-books and those who are scared of them.

It’s been said that e-books have lowered the bar on the word count of books. Books are apparently getting shorter.

I found in “Replacing textbooks with e-books may be a mistake”, when reading online people have shorter attention spans so they don’t pay attention to as much material as they would in a psychical book. Also, people can’t read e-books the way they read physical books (highlighting, annotating, etc). Yet there is talk that e-books are replacing textbooks like having Kindles or iPads in school. However, this can create strains with different learning styles.

Let’s keep in mind Libraries and Typewriters have undergone a transformation, too. Many a Library’s budget now goes to computers instead of the space for reading. “Bye-Bye Bookstores” talks about a future with “books but no bookstores, libraries but no readers in evidence.”

“RIP Typewriters” talks about typewriters being replaced by computers. Typewriters are now being used by those hipsters who are drawn by the nostalgia. I think the same can be said about books. There will be a group of people who will view books as retro and want them but it will be for a nostalgic purpose.

Physical books will become nostalgic.

With all the options out there to get e-books, people will miss out on most of everything. There are no more limitations due to language barriers or what people heard reviewed in the media. According to “The Sad, Beautiful Fact That We’re All Going To Miss Almost Everything”, when faced with all these options, people have to practice either culling (choosing what to pay attention to for themselves) or surrendering (accepting there is so much out there and no matter how hard you try you can’t read it all).

Most people do culling and throw out entire genres because it’s easier and people have to narrow their choices somehow. I believe it is evident that most people do this because of all the drop down menus that help you search through what is out there.

Culling is being in denial and thinking you can read it all — or at least, what matters.

Surrender is accepting that there is always something else to be read. But the writer says surrender can be good since it shows that there is so much cultural value in our societies.

Although many publishers feel that e-books are evil, some view them in a positive light. E-books breathe new life into reading and make it better for readers. Writers can get their work out to people when publishers wouldn’t give them the chance. Yes, e-books are even good for publishers – they can help to “expand your audience and provide them a more convenient and innovative reading experience.”

All in all, I’m excited to see where e-books can go. It’s not going away. I can definitely see a future where e-books are way more interactive, almost like you’re seeing a movie but reading at the same time. There are even tablets for kids!

The LeapFrog Tablet...they're starting them young these days.

After all, similar to journalism, aren’t people just trying to find the best way to tell a story?

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , ,

The current state of things

Posted by: | December 1, 2011 | No Comment |

Borders is gone.

The question is why? Well for most, it’s not a question. It’s a warning. A warning to show that in this age of technology you have to adapt — or be left in the dust.

A Wall Street Journal titled “One Chapter Closes…As New One Is Opening” describes the fall of Borders. They couldn’t find a buyer. Their physical book sales went down. They didn’t adapt to e-books fast enough. Currently Amazon, Apple and Google dominate the e-book market.

Bookstores or ebooks? (Photo courtesy of http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/11/30/apple-ipad-vs-kindle-vs-nook-popularity-comparison/)

 

In the Washington Post’s “Borders killed by many self-inflicted paper cuts, not Web”, they say Borders said it failed because of the rapidly changing book industry, e-reader revolution and the economy. Borders lost its competitive edge, didn’t have effective business models and it over-extended itself.

According to a salon.com article, most independent bookstores weren’t too crazy about such retail stores like Barnes & Noble or Borders. But these retail stores also brought books into communities that might not have had independent stores and people are still upset that the chain closed. They say the bookstores helped the community. They created jobs, they created a space for people to read and talk about what they’ve read. The workers believed in books and helped customers see what they had been missing.

In the same article, there are some authors who are considering opening up their own bookstores now that Borders has closed. Many authors reminisced about going to Borders. It was an experience. One author compared what e-books have done to authors to what downloads have done to artists. Artists lose money from the downloads but make up for it on tours. Authors generally make more money from e-books than mass-market paperback sales. Indeed some, like Amanda Hocking, have even made millions from their e-books.

E-books are making people adapt to the new technology. People are reading more because of the convenience. E-books take advantage of the impulse buy and most importantly e-books are cheaper than most of the other options out there.

In “What an E-Reader Can’t Download,” Heitman reminds us that reading isn’t just about taking in words. Physical books can represent memories that go along with them. You don’t get that from an e-book.

Finally, I found in “From Gutenberg to Zoobert” that similar to newspapers, the independent bookstores received profits for a long time before the bigger chains came along. E-books have hurt the chains, who have only been around since the 1980s or later. Also similar to journalism now, the new technologies are changing what books are. E-books can be more interactive with the audience and provide information for further exploration at the click of a button or the tap of a finger.

So, what’s next?

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

It took the Village Voice

Posted by: | November 29, 2011 | No Comment |

When Norman Mailer, Dan Wolf and Ed Fancher established the Village Voice, they didn’t have experience in the newspaper business.

Fancher was the publisher of the Voice, Wolf the editor and Mailer was officially a silent partner. According to Menand, Wolf later said “If we had known more, we certainly would have suffered less.” Nonetheless, the Village Voice thrived and, in the process, set a standard for newspapers in the nineteen-sixties. Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

Before Borders

Posted by: | November 28, 2011 | 1 Comment |

Before going into the death of Borders and the changes in the ways we publish and consume written works, it is important to understand how we got here.

computersmiths.com

It all goes back to 618 where the Chinese — not Gutenberg — invented block printing to reproduce copies of the tipao. The tipao were official newsletters and used to spread news to elite groups within the Chinese Empire. Then…not a whole lot happened for awhile.

Printing press from 1811, photographed in Muni...

Image via Wikipedia

It wasn’t until 1450 when Johann Gutenberg famously invented and used his letter press that things would begin to change around the world. Fast forward another 70 years to 1517 when Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses. The press would play a pivotal role in ensuring that his ideas would not die with a simple book-burning or excommunication.

Instead of painstakingly reproducing copies of books and other written works by hand, it was now easy to use the press to publish. The introduction and proper utilization of the press into societies with low literacy rates makes it one of the most important inventions of human history. With more books available, more people had access to them and information was flowing faster than ever before.

If we go back to the fifth century, Sumerian clay tablets have been discovered in tact. On one of these tablets, a letter discusses the author’s confidence that clay tablets will never be replaced for papyrus.

“They have a rich earthy smell and make for heft in one’s hands. Papyrus will never take the place of clay.”

List of the victories of Rimush, king of Akkad...

Image via Wikipedia

Sound familiar?

Eerily familiar in fact.

Print is dying just as clay died many thousands of years ago. Tablets (the new kind, not the clay kind) are gaining more users and many are reading exclusively on E-Readers and Kindles. These devices, shaped like tablets, allow for users to store and purchase many books without…well…the book. It is all saved on a hard drive and accessible anytime — as long as your device is charged!

We are experiencing a change in the playing field, and a pretty big one. Print has been dominant for centuries, so it will be a challenging and interesting transition to digital. Print will stay around, probably as more of a novelty than anything else, but the bulk of published work will be designed and published for consumers using electronic readers and other similar devices.

cnet.com

It is funny to see how everything comes full-circle. Tablets to papyrus to the printing press and now back to tablets. What’s next?

under: Comm 455, Uncategorized
Tags: , , , ,

Let me take you back to a time when news was not instantaneous. When news was spread by paperboys on street corners and families would learn of the happenings of the world from a piece of paper in the morning and a television set at night.

Life in the 1960’s in America, during the height of the newspaper industry, was an exciting time.

Bob Greene, who spent his early journalism career at the Columbus Citizen-Journal and Columbus Dispatch, reminisces on the wonder years of the American newspaper industry in his memoir, The Late Edition: A Love Story. In his recounts, Greene tells of working as a copyboy for the local newspaper, with high accord:

“All that sound, all that excitement, the motion, the raised voices, the clatter, the sense of something being put together on the fly. I had never seen anything like it. I was in love. I had to be there.”

In an interview with NPR, Greene spoke about life at the Columbus Citizen-Journal and how the experience was instrumental in forming his later career in journalism. His infatuation with the paper was inspiring and inciting.

With all the points of interest that Greene speaks about, I found myself drawn to one more than the others: the treatment of women in the workplace.

I knew of the gender inequalities from shows like Mad Men and from watching movies set in the same time period but in reading the first hand accounts, it struck a different chord and made it more personal.

Greene recounted the struggle that women had working in a male dominant environment. Women were not treated equally as men and had to deal with obscene mistreatment in the form of howling and whistling whenever a woman would walk in. Greene said:

“It was how the men there reacted to women—apparently it was a tradition. I would hear in later years from women who worked at newspapers around the country, that they

had endured it, too. It’s somewhat astonishing, to recall it now: a time when a young woman coming to work each day at a newspaper knew that, on certain floors, this was what would await her.”

What was interesting to me was women would receive this treatment up until at

least the late-80’s and early-90’s. I was reading, Those Guys Have All the Fun, and came across the same abuse.

At ESPN, women were and even to this day are victims of sexual harassment. In the late-80’s, anchor Karie Ross made a stand against the mistreatment. She saw that many of the young female anchors and interns were being sexually harassed and taken advantage of.

In a board meeting with administrators in attendance, Ross spoke out:
“Look, this behavior has got to stop. This is crazy. You guys can’t be doing this. Guys, you must stop sexually harassing these women. Don’t be trading edit time for a date. Quit making all the lewd comments. Just let us work in peace.”
Her bravery would bring the issue to light and would cause administrators to crack down on the abuse that was taking place within their offices.
It’s truly sickening that acts like these occur on a daily basis and those involved are not reprimanded accordingly. With scandals of sexual abuse and misconduct occurring seemingly everyday, it can be disheartening to many. But, when someone is put in a position where they feel uncomfortable and no one does anything, it is more of a tragedy.
The Late Edition was an interesting read, however, I found myself honing my attention to the aspect of sexual harassment throughout instead of other themes.

 

 

 

under: Local news, newspapers, Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , ,

I will admit it; I was a late-comer to Twitter. I still don’t use it to post my own tweets, but it fascinates me to read. Being obsessed with celebrity culture, I’ve been most drawn to Twitter’s most famous tweet-o-philes. I started with Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk), moving on to John Mayer (@johncmayer), and then comedians such as Michael Ian Black (@michaelianblack) and Sarah Silverman (@SarahkSilverman). I was looking for funny entertainment — nothing more, nothing less.

Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , ,

The Village gains a Voice

Posted by: | November 24, 2011 | No Comment |

Have you heard of The Village Voice? It began as a neighborhood paper in Greenwich Village but ultimately changed journalism. As Louis Menand explains in “It Took A Village: How the Voice changed journalism,” The Village Voice changed what it meant to be a journalist.

The Village Voice was founded by Norman Mailer, Dan Wolf and Edwin Fancher in 1955. Although it was not the first local paper in Greenwich Village, it was the most successful. It survived the deaths of four other New York City newspapers (and most of its imitators) and had a longer life-span than the weekly Life, according to Menand.

The history of the Voice’s journey to success is a long one; so to make matters easy, here is a simple chronology of the papers milestones Menand discusses. Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , , ,

In the early morning hours of Tuesday November 15th, Will Wheaton, former actor (Star Trek, Stand By Me) and current independent blogger, tweeted from Zucotti Park in New York:

Isn’t it against the law for the NYPD to bar credentialed press from entry to Zuccotti and #occupywallstreet? What are they trying to hide?

His tweet was in reference to the “evacuation” of all credentialed news media in the proximity of the original Occupy Wall Street movement, before police stormed the community, making arrests and destroying the personal property of occupiers who weren’t able to clear out their tents and other amenities that had been compiled over the duration of the two-month occupation.

The OWS Library Twitter feed commented later:

NYPD has closed airspace above park to prevent news helicopters from filming. It’s an unprecedented violation of free press.

But there are still videos of arrests and police brutality popping up all over YouTube, thanks to citizen journalists with Flip Cams and Smart phones capable of instant uploads.

Welcome to the Information Age, kids.

The revolution will not be televised… it’ll be on YouTube.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , ,

Technology and Journalism.

The two words go together like peanut butter and jelly.

Journalism as a whole has been influenced by technology greatly over the past hundreds of years. The biggest enhancement has been the velocity at which news is delivered and distributed. As technology has gotten better and better, the speed of news has gone up exponentially.

In the 1990s a new technological innovation, the Internet, began to creep its way into the business of journalism. It started off slowly, as publications one by one tried moving content online. Now it would be difficult to find someone who does not use the Internet to gather news, whether it is the only medium or not.

The best part of online journalism may be that it can be corrected. In a print paper, if a mistake is made it can’t be fixed until the next issue. Online, a mistake can be corrected seconds, minutes, hours or days later. Because of this self-correction, Wikipedia has become a credible source for information. Almost anything you can think of is on Wikipedia, because anyone can post on it. Some may feel that this citizen journalism is false more often than not. However, Wikipedia allows any user to correct pages and sources are posted at the bottom of the page.

Read More…

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , ,

 

Harold Ross and Henry Luce may not ring a bell but The New Yorker and Time magazine probably do. Ross and Luce were publishing rivals that shared one common goal: success.

Read More…

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , , ,

The world had long operated under the logical assumption that if you wanted your news to spread, you or someone else had to get themselves out there and spread it yourselves. There was no magic string connecting one town with another by which news, ideas, and trade could be spread. That was ludicrous… Read More…

under: Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories