header image

View the story “Journalism Interactive ” on Storify]

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , ,

The Internet.

It’s bigger than every newspaper, television network, radio station and CB line combined.

The transfer of information from one side of the world, once taking days, weeks, or even months, is now instantaneous.

Through the brilliance of Skype, my next-door neighbor can speak face to face with members of his family back in Korea in real time.

Through the brilliance of Facebook, I can carry on several typed conversations at once with friends and family members from all over the world, while ordering a pizza on another tab, playing Angry Birds on a third, AND watching old episodes of Beverly Hills 90210.

All from my computer.

But I can still do more…

I can see pictures of places I’ve never dreamed of traveling to, like the Great Wall of China, and live the experience of visiting firsthand, as best I can, from the comfort of my Barcalounger in Loudon County, VA.

I can read about and write about and create information about topics I wouldn’t ever dream of studying in the classrooms I (choose to) inhabit several hours a week.

First through stumbleupon.com, and now through a real web gem I’ve stumbled upon, khanacademy.org, I’ve been able to absorb more information for practical use than I confidently feel I’ve ever before absorbed in a University classroom.

And the information, produced by regular people in their regular way of relating information, with the help of the infinitely marvelous YouTube video (pause, drag left, play = the way to communicate with the younger “30-second spot” generations) is easier to understand than any professor I’ve ever met has made it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEitrZU-nCw

If you don’t have time to watch the whole video, just skip ahead to 3:30 and listen to the words.

(And when you do get a chance, watch the whole video. The lyrics, combined with the visual images, moved me to tears).

“The Internet and public services provide free education. So it really ain’t a case of “rich” or “poor.” It’s a case of self-motivation and nothing more.”

But what is education? The transfer of information from one learned individual to another.

And what is one of the most valued commodities known to man?

Education.

Mark Cuban, billionaire owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks, and one of my favorite people on the planet, relates some of the stories of his young, post-collegiate days that turned out to be the earliest days of his meteoric rise on his blog: blogmaverick.com.

In one post, he details his early days as a 24 year-old computer software salesman, living in a 3-bedroom apartment in Dallas with five other friends, driving “a ’77 FIAT X19 that burned a quart of oil that I couldn’t afford every week.”

Working on commission and a meager hourly wage, Cuban found early on that his sales would increase when he knew more about the products than the consumers did.

“Turns out,” he says, “not a lot of people ever bothered to RTFM (read the frickin’ manual), so people started really thinking I knew my stuff. As more people came in, because I knew all the different software packages we offered, I could offer honest comparisons and customers respected that.”

He was absorbing information, and benefiting directly from it, without having to set foot in a classroom.

Granted, Cuban did graduate from college with a business degree. And he may have, in a class or two, heard a professor mention the importance of reading the frickin’ manual. And if that’s the case, then this story has no relevance what-so-ever.

But otherwise, Cuban used the same intuitive spirit that’s alive in a large percentage of the world’s population to not only get ahead a little, but to gain a foothold at the base of a gigantic mountain that became known as his multi-billion dollar, NBA Championship-winning career.

So, what’s the point of all this. Don’t go to college?

No, that’s definitely not it. Although, some of my classmates from years past would argue that their four years would have been better spent learning a trade on the job, instead of compiling tens-of-thousands of dollars of debt that they can’t pay back because they’re “under-qualified” to earn more than $24,000 a year.

The point is that you should take every opportunity to learn.

And THAT is what the Internet is for.

It’s there, 24 hours a day, for you to learn from, free of charge.

And while there aren’t yet any Universities that I know of that award “Master’s of the Internet” degrees, that’s no reason to discredit the Internet as a sub-standard learning tool and cast it aside.

Because when you do earn your degree, and you go into a job interview hoping to get your first real taste of adulthood, you won’t be quizzed on the specific date of the beginning of the French Revolution. You’ll be asked what you know about pvc pipes (or whatever product it is that you’ll be selling).

And if you’re smart, you spent the entire week leading up to the interview Google-ing “pvc pipe.”

That’s what gets you the job. And that’s what gets you ahead.

“It’s a case of self-motivation, and nothing more.”

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

Why is fake news so popular?

Posted by: | November 1, 2011 | No Comment |

The Onion.

How is it so popular? I have never appealed to it, but maybe I’m just a weirdo who focuses on reality. A satirical newspaper is so unnecessary to me. We already have SNL poking fun, lets leave the news medium we love so much alone.

Maybe I’m just jealous.

This article on Yahoo! made me think why The Onion is even around. Something so close to libel is read probably just as much as The Washington Post, or The New York Times online sites.

I know there is no way to get rid of this fake news, but I will still keep wishing. Sure it can be entertaining, but a well written hard news story should be just as entertaining. Though that is not always the case. Anyway, humor should be left to the comic section of a respected area newspaper; not some stupid fake online source that basically just causes problems.

I’m surprised nobody has tried to get rid of The Onion. I do understand their rights, but they have caused plenty of confusion, even forcing investigations, according to the Yahoo! report.

Hopefully that’s enough to make someone try to shut it down, before it goes a little too far and causes some real damage.

Read More…

under: Uncategorized

Celebrating Osama Bin Laden’s death.

Rashard Mendenhall of the Pittsburgh Steelers was not in a celebratory mood.  The fourth year running back took to his twitter account and expressed his anger over the celebration along with his belief Bin Laden did not order the attack.

The post sparked outrage among fans across the country forcing the Steelers to meet with Mendenhall to address his comments.

Mendenhall is just one of many athletes that are now under the microscope for everything they say, tweet, or act out.  It begs the question, where should the line be drawn.

Should players be held accountable by their employer like a majority of common citizens who work for a private company, or is their First Amendment right being violated?

Twitter has also exposed the ugly side of sports writers.  A perfect example occurred today.  The Philadelphia Flyers tried to restrict access to new goaltender Ilya Bryzgalov to only after games he plays in.  This new policy did not sit well with some of the Philadelphia writers.  This led to a feud between a blogger and two beat contributors on twitter.

The media is trying so hard to maintain they know more than you the reader do, and yet they seem to be the ones who act the most juvenile on twitter.  Perhaps I’m following the wrong writers, but it seems to have become an epidemic and it needs to stop.

 

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

The death of Borders: Introduction

Posted by: | November 1, 2011 | No Comment |
Borders Closing

Photo courtesy of http://readingforrobin.wordpress.com/tag/borders-closing/

When I first heard Borders was going out of business, my first thought was “where else was I going to get such good coffee?”

Yea, I didn’t think about the books.

I have the Kindle App on my phone. I have google books. I have Barns & Noble as well as the other bookstores in the area.

Honestly, I couldn’t remember the last time I had stepped into a Borders. I didn’t know much about exactly why Borders closed down. When I saw that it was a superblog topic for this class, I figured I should try to understand exactly what had happened. I had a vague idea that it had something to do with them not jumping on the Kindle/ebook craze but I didn’t think much of it.

Then, I had gotten a kind of annoying email from William Lynch, CEO of Barns & Noble saying that they were sorry Borders had closed down, they had bought the Borders Customer List and advertisements about Nook products.

My curiosity was peaked even more. So this company said they were sorry Borders closed but were basically taking over what Borders had been and advertising what Borders didn’t do?

That’s kinda messed up.

And that’s where my interest of this topic began.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

Entertainment vs. news

Posted by: | November 1, 2011 | No Comment |

The earliest newspapers played it safe by limiting coverage to foreign news.  Why risk publishing something the monarch or church didn’t like?

In 2011, one of the most common complaints about U.S. media is that it doesn’t cover international news as much as other countries do.  Why?  Nathan Lustig, a successful college-aged entrepreneur, blogger and British media consumer has an interesting answer to this question.

Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , , , ,

Newspapers vs. The Internet

Posted by: | October 31, 2011 | No Comment |

Old news vs. New news. The decline of the newspaper industry is imminent. With a decline in circulation and an increasing number of online newspapers, the paper newspaper that we are accustomed to is on the path to extinction. If this video doesn’t foreshadow it’s demise then I don’t know what does.

 

under: newspapers, social media
Tags: , , , ,

Hearst made headlines

Posted by: | October 25, 2011 | No Comment |

Traditionally, newspapers primarily contained information about war, crime and other hard news relevant to the community it was distributed in. So, when did sensationalism and yellow journalism come into play? This video explains.

under: Comm 455
Tags: , ,

Reed Hasting presentation (Source: The New York Times)

Netflix has encountered problems in the recent third quarter as a result of a change in its business model. Similar to the changing face of how we receive and interact with news, Netflix has altered the way we interact with films.

When the change from spoken to written to printed news occurred, there was less of a choice in how society spread news. If the news needed to be given to a fairly small village, spoken news, or word of mouth, worked. Written news became effective for spreading news across a distance and preserving it for posterity. Printed news not only worked for spreading across large distances, but it ensured that everyone received identical information.

In today’s media world, we are shifting to electronic news. Newspapers are a slow process and, to be honest, by the time the news has been printed, the people who care have already heard about it. We can now read the news anywhere, from the broadcast news to our smartphones to the most basic e-readers.

Now the challenge is how to make money off of electronic news being so easily accessible.

The answer? Paywalls.

How does this relate to Netflix though? Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , , , ,

Lincoln and the news.

Posted by: | October 25, 2011 | No Comment |

With our Super-Blog themes hanging over our heads, this semester’s crop of burgeoning printed news historians would be well served to continue seeking out the “little known facts” of history that never got much pub.

These lesser known knowledge nuggets are usually small pieces of larger stories that defined history.

Like the story of Abraham Lincoln!

… wait, wait wait where are you going? Hands off the mouse… there’s a point I’m getting to, I promise.

Read More…

under: Comm 455
Tags: , ,

Paparazzi

Posted by: | October 25, 2011 | No Comment |
“I’m your biggest fan. I’ll follow you until you love me. Papa-paparazzi.” – Lady Gaga

The paparazzi as we know it is a relatively new phenomena and term. It originates from Fellini’s film, La Dolce Vita. In it, an Italian photographer named Paparazzo — an Italian dialect word that describes the annoying noise similar to a buzzing mosquito — was a fast talker. By the late 1960s, the word, usually in the Italian plural form of paparazzi, had entered English as a generic term for intrusive photographers.

 

Today, anyone can look at the hordes of paparazzi that swarm celebrities all over the world and see how fitting that term actually is.
This style of gossip news that the public so craves is not a new phenomena, however. How could Anne Boleyn losing her head not be news worth sharing? She broke up a marriage, helped King Henry VIII leave the Catholic Church and create the Church of England, and was killed after all that work.
By reading this schlock, our brains don’t have to concentrate. We don’t have to think. The off switch can be turned off. Without these types of news stories, or even without the use of gossipy details within straight stories, the news would be a lot less interesting.
But what about those celebrities the paparazzi effect?
Lindsay Lohan, for example, is one of those sad stories that people love. They want to see her rise up from her failures and mistakes just as Britney Spears did, but they love to watch her fall deeper and deeper down the rabbit hole. Having the constant attention does not help her with her recovery and the recovering of her privacy and safety.

 

Lindsay Wants Restraining Order Against Paparazzi 

Lindsay Lohan believes she’s being denied driving privileges because the paparazzi are constantly on her tail … so she’s asking her lawyer to get a restraining order prohibiting them from chasing her.As we first reported, the L.A. County Probation Department — along with the DMV — have given Lindsay the green light to drive again.
Lindsay Lohan Seeks Protection Against the Paparazzi – Softpedia 

Lindsay Lohan Seeks Protection Against the Paparazzi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWdt2poQZtk

Sometimes celebrities lash back at the paparazzi, just like Travis Barker from Blink-182 did here (NSFW):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htKWLicTnn8

Celebrity gossip supersite, TMZ, had thoughts to bring that madness to DC. Luckily for us in the DC area, that never really came to fruition successfully. I cannot fathom the mess it would create in traffic, both for pedestrians and commuters. I also couldn’t fathom our celebrities being important enough. I mean who really cares about what burger Obama ate today?

From The Hills To The Hill: TMZ Turns Its Focus To D.C. 

TMZ will soon be giving Lindsey Graham the Lindsay Lohan treatment, as the company sics its “reporters” and camera crews on politicians. Because if there’s one thing Washington needs, it’s more frivolous reporting. Though TMZ dropped its plans to open a Washington office in 2007, it has…
http://twitter.com/ashbylaw/status/128571102522912768
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fjm-xW2jU8

The paparazzi even were the probable cause of Princess Diana’s death. They were chasing her down to catch her with her new beau, which led to the high-speed crash where she perished.

Such tragedy can happen when we let these people with cameras ruin lives. So why do we let them ruin other peoples lives with their lenses?
Do we just enjoy watching the bloodbath and cannot look away, as if we are in the Coliseum watching the gladiators of the day duke it out against tigers and each other, fighting to the death?
I personally think we hope to see failure. Once we see a celebrity fall, we see they are human and just like us. It’s also that we like to see how they bounce back from that sort of fall from grace. Some do it well… and some… well they are pushed to the edge.

 

under: Comm 455, Storify, Uncategorized
Tags: , , ,

Is baseball still relevant?

Posted by: | October 25, 2011 | No Comment |

[View the story “Americas Pastime, but not the future” on Storify]

under: Uncategorized

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories